 |
 |
THE STORY
From 1975 to 1981 one man cast
a pall of fear over the North of England. He became known
as the Yorkshire Ripper. He committed more than a dozen ritual
murders which were attended with a vicious brutality. He linked
the murders by specific atrocities and wrote mockingly to
the police while they desperately hunted him. His victims
were mostly prostitutes, some vulnerable poor girls and also
ordinary working girls just out late at night. His modus operandi,
or method, was to strike the victims with a hammer blow to
the head, drag her if not already in the darkness, into the
shadows, sexually assault her, rob her, then mutilate her
with a flurry of knife wounds, sometimes biting her on the
breasts; redressing and re-arrangement of the clothing, particularly
the shoes, and finally covering the remains with her own coat.
In this way twenty three children were left motherless. They
were a terrorising series of murders at irregular intervals,
in different cities, over a wide area of Northern England.
They caused widespread ripples of fear and were accompanied
by letters from the Ripper to the police, who were hunting
him. These letters promised further murders with chilling
accuracy and added a new dimension of a cunning maniac playing
games with the police. More than 300 detectives worked full
time on this hunt for three years. It caused widespread suspicion,
interrogation and fear as well as costing more than £4 million
pounds.
The Yorkshire Ripper murders apparently
came to an end in 1981 with the arrest and subsequent conviction
of a bearded lorry driver called Peter William Sutcliffe.
This man confessed to all the Ripper's acknowledged murders
except one, that of Joan Harrison,
a poor girl from Preston, Lancashire. The West Yorkshire police
succeeded in gaining the conviction of Sutcliffe in the Old
Bailey in London, in May 1981. The public felt delivered from
the Ripper threat. They were convinced that at last the Ripper
was behind bars.

The nightmare began in Leeds, Yorkshire in January
1976, when the body of 42 year old Emily Jackson, a mother of three was discovered
by shocked workmen in a derelict site. Emily had been sexually
assaulted and mutilated near the Gaiety pub, outside which
she had earlier been soliciting for prostitution. This murder
was immediately linked by the police to a similar style ritual
murder of a prostitute, one Wilma McCann, a 26 year old mother of four children.
Wilma had been murdered near her home in Leeds eleven weeks
earlier. Both prostitute victims were robbed and sexually
assaulted. The maniac was dubbed the Yorkshire Ripper by the
media. There was a lull for more than a year. The nightmare
returned to Leeds in February 1977, when the body of 26 year
old Irene Richardson, a mother of two, was found
in a park in Leeds. Irene was poor and unemployed, but she
was not a prostitute. This murder was a serious challenge
to the police because it bore the Ripper's hall marks. Two
and a half months later, a Bradford prostitute, 32 year old
Tina Atkinson, a mother of three, was found
brutally murdered and mutilated in her bed at her flat in
Bradford. Tina had been sexually assaulted, and her body bore
all the hall marks of the Ripper. Two months later the Ripper
was back in his old hunting ground in Leeds. In June 1977
the body of 16 year old shop assistant, Jane MacDonald, was found in a children's
playground near her home. The murder bore all the Rippers
hall marks. After this murder George Oldfield, the assistant
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police was placed in overall
command of the Ripper hunt.
With five acknowledged Ripper victims to date,
on the 9th of October 1977 there was a puzzling murder of
a prostitute, Jean Jordan in Manchester.
Jean had been murdered one week before her body was discovered
and it appeared the killer had returned and pulled her body
from a double hedge to expose it. The Manchester police did
not regard this as a Ripper murder. It did not bear the hall
marks of Yorkshire Jack, but such a strange murder of a prostitute
at this time, was puzzling.
In January 1978, the body of 18 year old attractive
halfcast Helen Rytka was found hidden behind a pile of timber
in a wood-yard in Huddersfield. There was no doubt that it
was Jack again. Huddersfield was George Oldfield's home town.
Oldfield, perhaps feeling responsible for attracting the Ripper
to his own town appealed to the public for help. He wanted
to trace every punter that drove by the toilets in Great Northern
Street on that night. It was a mammoth police operation which
put both the public and the police under great strain. The
police at this time justifiably felt that the Ripper was playing
games with them. Three and a half months later, on the 16th
of May 1978, the body of 41 year old prostitute, Vera
Millward, a mother of seven children was found in a car
park at the rear of Manchester Royal Infirmary. This Manchester
murder bore all the Yorkshire Ripper's hall marks. The Manchester
and West Yorkshire police now joined forces to track this
demon down. There was a second lull in the Ripper's activity
for almost a year. However, two weeks after the Millward murder
the police announced that the earlier murder of Jean Jordan
in Manchester was also a Ripper murder. Then in September
of that year they also announced, that Joan
Harrison, a 26 year old down and out girl who had been
murdered in Preston, Lancashire in November 1975, was a Ripper
victim. They also included in the Ripper frame, the murder
in January that year of prostitute Yvonne Pearson in Bradford. A series of four
unsolved attacks on women were also brought in as the work
of the Ripper. These were the attacks on Mrs. Rogulsky, Mrs. Smelt, Maureen Long and Marilyn Moore.
In all of these cases it was assumed that the Ripper was interrupted
before he finished the job.
The North of England was understandably uptight
through the winter of 1978, until on the 4th of April 1979
a 19 year old respectable clerical worker Josephine Whittaker was found brutally murdered
in a park in Halifax, near her home. Josephine's body had
been partially covered with her coat and it bore all the Ripper's
hall marks. This murder caused widespread fear because it
was thought that the Ripper only murdered prostitutes but
Josephine's character was beyond reproach.

On the 26th of June 1979, the combined police
forces held an amazing press conference. George Oldfield announced
to the press that the Ripper had sent him some communications.
He produced three letters and an audio cassette tape which
he stated were from the Ripper. Oldfield played a sample of
the taunting tape recording to the assembled media. The Ripper
spoke with a flat Geordie accent and he promised another murder
in September or October. Because of confidential information
contained in the letters and tape recording, police were sure
they came from the Ripper. Oldfield, who had assumed something
of a personal challenge with the Ripper took a desperate gamble.
He was assuming that the handwriting was not altered and that
the voice was not mimicked. He asked for assistance and was
given a massive free publicity campaign which would have cost
over a million pounds.

The sentiments and the title of the bearded Andrew Gold's album
"All this and Heaven too", and the postage stamp image,
were carefully selected by Tracey to taunt the police.
Tracey delivered his promise on the Ist of September
with chilling accuracy.
Billy Tracey
19 year old Bradford university student Barbara Leach was murdered by the Ripper and her
body was found hidden beside dustbins at the rear of a house,
only 750 yards from Bradford central police station. Barbara's
body bore all the Ripper's hall marks. The publicity campaign
to identify the Geordie letter writer became more urgent.
There was a third lull in the Ripper's activities. People
began to breathe again, until on the 18th of November 1980,
newspapers and T.V announced the discovery of murdered 20
year old student Jacqueline Hill in Leeds university grounds. The
police announced that she was not the Ripper's 13th victim.

Sunday Times article
Twenty four hours later they changed their mind
and announced that Jacqueline was the Ripper's 13th victim.
There was widespread anger in Leeds and the police came under
serious and mounting pressure. Only six weeks later, they
held another amazing press conference. On the 5th of January
1981, West Yorkshire's Chief Constable Ronald Gregory announced
that a man had been detained in Sheffield and was being questioned
in relation to the Yorkshire Ripper murders. Asked if the
Ripper hunt was being scaled down Gregory replied: 'You are
right.' There was widespread public relief and the pressure
on the police was relaxed. Peter William Sutcliffe was charged
with the murder of Jacqueline Hill six weeks earlier and stealing
a pair of number plates valued at fifty pence. He didn't seek
bail. Sutcliffe was remanded in custody until, on the 12th
of February it was announced that he would be appearing in
Dewsbury magistrates court to answer further serious charges.
On the 20th of February he duly appeared at this court, where
twelve charges of murder and seven of attempted murder, all
on the grounds of diminished responsibility, were put to him.
He pleaded guilty to them. In the previous five weeks, Sutcliffe,
with the aid of his defence lawyer had made a deal with the
prosecution. In return for the prosecution's offer of leniency
and a promise of confinement in a luxury mental home, with
the prospect of parole in ten years, Sutcliffe admitted to
all the murders, however, he adamantly denied that he murdered
Joan Harrison in Preston, or so the public were
told. In addition, he was charged with and pleaded guilty
to the murder of Margo Walls, in 1980, and three assaults in the
latter part of 1980, also to the assault of Marcella Claxton in Leeds, in 1976. None of
these five crimes were included in the Ripper frame at the
time of his arrest.

Peter Sutcliffe
On the 29th of April 1981, the case came before
Mr. Justice Boreham in the Old Bailey, in London. The Attorney
General of England, Sir Michael Havers, was prosecuting the
case, and he advised the judge, that four psychiatrists had
reached consensus as regards Sutcliffe's state of mind. All
were agreed that Sutcliffe had diminished responsibility when
he committed the crimes, that in fact, he was mad. The prosecution
were then pleading on behalf of Sutcliffe as part of the deal;
his defence didn't have to say a word. Justice Boreham refused
to accept Sir Michael's plea, and ordered that Sutcliffe's
sanity be tested by a jury. On the 5th of May the jury hearing
commenced. Sutcliffe spoke of his mission from God, and the
psychiatrists, for both prosecution and defence, gave evidence
and agreed that he was mad. Because of Sutcliffe's admission
to all the murders, his guilt was not in question and little
evidence was produced at the hearing, other than an assortment
of tools. Only his sanity was being tested. The jury ultimately
disagreed with both Sutcliffe and the psychiatrists and pronounced
the Ripper sane. The judge sentenced him to thirty years in
jail, rather than the mental home treatment which he had been
promised by the police.
There was instant clamour for explanations.
Sutcliffe's character didn't square up to the crimes he committed.
His friends, family and neighbours were shocked and his wife
Sonia announced that she would stand by him. Sutcliffe did
not have a criminal record and to a lot of people he was one
hell of a nice guy. The last murder he committed, that of
Jacqueline Hill in Leeds, was still very fresh
in peoples' minds, also the large amount of corroborating
evidence linking Sutcliffe and his car with the scene of this
crime. This was the murder Sutcliffe was first charged with
after his arrest.
What the public didn't know was
the real reason why Jacqueline Hill was stated to be a victim
of the Yorkshire Ripper. After the trial,
the Geordie letter writer was written off by the police as
a cruel hoaxer. Calls for a public enquiry into the investigation
were ignored by the authorities but media pressure forced
Ronald Gregory, the Chief Constable, to institute an internal
police enquiry into the handling of the investigation. This
enquiry was conducted by his Deputy Chief Constable, Mr. Colin
Sampson, who later became Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire
Police. However, all politicians were not satisfied and called
for a public enquiry. To answer this demand, the Home Office
reluctantly agreed that it would conduct it's own independent
investigation. Publication of minor details led to some police
criticism but nobody lost their jobs. There was no public
enquiry, although the public were the ones that were murdered,
and the ones at risk.
Sutcliffe's brother Michael was interviewed
by a B.B.C. reporter... "There's no reason, no excuse he's
given me whatsoever, when he's talking. I don't think he knows
himself. I can't think of one instance, just not one instance,
why ?"
A friend of Sutcliffe's spoke to the same reporter.
'It's a queer subject. When you know actually, that he is
the Ripper but when you've known him as a friend, the biggest
part of your life, to my mind, he's still a friend. I would
go out with him tonight.' WHY? 'He's a friend. He's a very
good friend. He's been good to me all my life. He's helped
me out, fixed me cars. If you ever needed a hand, you know,
on your own, Peter would help you. If you ever needed a loan,
if he got any money, Peter would help you. He'd do anything
for you. You don't know what turns a fella that way or what
causes him to do it. But I'd trust him with my daughters,
with my own daughters.'
Sutcliffe's Mission
from God
My opinion of Sutcliffe's role in the whole affair
is as follows. He married a girl who had serious mental problems.
She was sexually cold, devoid of love for him and totally
self centred and domineering. In many ways she was responsible
for disturbing this man's mind. After 6 years courting , followed
by less than one year of married life, the realisation of
this left him feeling wasted, worthless and with no future.
Whatever dreams he had were shattered by a Jeckyl and Hyde
wife whom he deeply despised. All women became hated objects
and Anna Rogulsky's screaming and threatening behaviour at
her boyfriend's door which he by chance witnessed, triggered
his first attack. Then came the attack on Mrs Smelt followed
by the sex attack on Tracy Browne and Leslie Moleseed. Then
in 1976 he attacked Marcella Claxton in Roundhay Park Leeds.
This brought him to the attention of Billy Tracey, the violent
pimp, who had a special squad looking for him for the two,
linked, Leeds, Ripper murders and he had left the area for
the moment. All these early attacks were sex attacks , masturbating
while touching up his victims. This was what Sonia had reduced
him to and I believe he didnt care if he were caught. It was
to reflect what she had done to him. His attacks received
scant publicity while the Ripper murders made the news headlines.
Then the murder of Irene Richardson in the same Roundhay Park
by Tracey followed by massive publicity must have affected
him greatly, given that Sutcliffe's crimes received little
or no publicity, particularly as Claxton was hardly mentioned
until after his arrest, but Tracey would have been aware of
it from the start. It was his opener. Two more Ripper murders
followed at regular intervals all accompanied by massive publicity.
Sutcliffe was being baited by the Ripper and he knew it. He
responded with the Long attack, then the Jordan murder in
Manchester where he returned to expose the body and returned
again later to plant the fiver with the handbag which he had
taken. Then the Wilkinson murder, then the Moore attack and
finally Pearson. While Pearson's body lay undiscovered the
Ripper murdered Helen Rytka in Huddersfield to a blaze of
publicity. The disturbed Peter Sutcliffe planted a newspaper
with one large Ripper story under Pearson's body. I see him
as desperate to be arrested at this stage. Clearly , by his
statements in court he felt that he was involved with the
occult. He felt driven and he saw himself involved in a battle
between good and evil. Somewhere here, his earlier sick and
perverted sex attacks were to be put aside and he saw himself
pitting his wits against the evil Ripper. This was his mission
from God. He would sacrifice his freedom to placate the Ripper,
an evil monster he had aroused. However this was easier said
than done. The police had evidence of the Ripper's blood and
semen. Sutcliffe's was different. It is on this issue that
the Ripper became national and international news and escalated
to frenzied proportions as the murders progressed. Tracey,
the career criminal and violent pimp, was supremely confident
of his ability to force the police to get someone for his
crimes. He knew that when the pressure came on the police,
someone had to be accused. He had done it many times before
but not on such a scale as this. His game was to force the
police to get the copy-cat and he was confident enough to
write to them and even send voice messages to them. He gave
them everything about himself except his name and recorded
fingerprints, thats how confident he was in his chosen career,
and while the average man in the street would think that every
policeman would be very interested to know the identity of
a killer, in this case they were scared to even find out.
It was more comfortable to dismiss it. The story of my efforts
to tell the police bears this confidence out . Nobody knew
better than Tracey how the police fitted up people for the
crimes of others. He was a master of psychology. It was this
supreme arrogance of the Ripper which made the police link
all his murders publicly because they felt they knew so much
about his identity that they would surely get him. It also
made it well nigh impossible for Sutcliffe to be blamed. Tracey's
letters and cassette message were part of that game plan until,
true to form as he saw it, he finally forced the police to
frame Sutcliffe, the mad man they had eliminated so thoroughly.
If the newspaper accounts of Sutcliffe's statements are studied
one will see the terrible dilemma he had landed himself into.
In the end he had to commit more murders just to prove to
police that he was the Ripper eventhough they knew his role
since about January 1980, that he was the copy cat killer.
Can you imagine his shock when in 1979 the police revealed
that the Ripper was in corrospondance with them. After the
Leach murder he said he felt that the Devil was driving him.
Then he actually attacked a journalist in Ilkeley hoping she
would report him. This attack was never in the Ripper frame.
Then in 1980 while Tracey lay low suspecting the police had
identified him, Sutcliffe really went berserk with at least
six attacks, three of whom were murdered. It was a complex
tit for tat battle for Sutcliffe culminating with him actually
staging his arrest in Sheffield because the West Yorkshire
police knew him so well. They knew he was the copy cat killer.
He planted hammers and knives in the police toilet, gave false
names, had wrong number plates on his car, had a prostitute
and told the police he was a Ripper suspect. The mission from
God theory was put forward by him later to divert attention
from his earlier perverted sick sex attacks which he was at
pains to deny. Dick Holland's deal on behalf of the police
would have ensured nobody would have ever known, had it not
been rejected by judge Boreham. It should be noted that all
of Sutcliffe's murders and attacks are fully corroborated
by both the known facts before his arrest and by his statements,
whereas with the Ripper murders his confessions are at odds
with the known facts and his statements are way off beam.
After the trial it was reluctantly conceded
by the West Yorkshire police that Peter Sutcliffe had been
a Ripper suspect for a number of years. In fact they revealed
that he had been interviewed not once, but nine times. His
first interview was on the 2nd of November 1977 with Manchester
detectives who were investigating the murder of Jean Jordan
in Manchester a few weeks previously. The strange killer had
returned to the scene of the murder one week later and removed
her body from the bushes. Almost a week later this mystery
man returned a second time to the scene and this time he dumped
the victim's handbag which contained a brand new five pound
note. The police knew that the fiver had been planted there
by the killer. They were anxious to identify this strange
man. The search for the fiver was narrowed down to a number
of works in the Bingley/Shipley area of Bradford. Clarke's
Transport was one of these works. Peter Sutcliffe was one
of Clarke's lorry drivers. Sutcliffe was quickly put on a
short list and six days later two policemen came to his house,
armed with a search warrant. They again questioned him and
his wife. This time, his wife Sonia gave him an alibi.
Mr. William Clarke, the managing director of
Clarkes Transport spoke to the B.B.C. reporter. "They came
in and they checked through everybody in the works, they checked
on all the money and also... Then they came back after a week,
and the handwriting. They came in again and checked all the
dates over again. They went through his handwriting again
and they reckoned there was something, it didn't make sense
and there was certain words they wanted reproduced. They then
took Peter in again for further questioning, into the police
station where he was for a quite considerable time."
A fellow lorry driver was interviewed also...
"100 per cent police search, saliva samples, blood samples,
handwriting samples, teeth, they checked his tools, boots,
footprints, car tyres, pulled his car to bits, and everything
turned out normal, and then two years later, they came to
him again. They took us all together, all in a block bunch,
not as individuals but in a block bunch. They did us all on
the same evening and all on the same day. So the following
morning, we were scared at work. Everybody was talking about
Him out there." WHAT WAS PETER SUTCLIFFE'S REACTION ? "It
was just the same as everybody else's They took a blood sample,
just the same as everybody else."
Sutcliffe's school teacher told a B.B.C. reporter...
"All I can remember is that he was a very quiet, obedient,
respectful boy. He never shone in any way and I would simply
say that he was of average intelligence but very quiet and
reserved."
Peter Sutcliffe's father was equally shocked
"No way am I going to desert him. I'm not going to write him
off. I want to remember the lad as he was."
Peter Sutcliffe, who was a disturbed attacker
of lone females in 1975 and in 1976 first became involved
with the Yorkshire Ripper on the 5th of February 1977 when
the Ripper murdered Irene Richardson in the same park in Leeds
where he had six months earlier assaulted the black girl Marcella Claxton. Peter
Sutcliffe got the message. However Sutcliffe's involvement
with the police did not come until nine months later. He was
a very disturbed and intense man. His marriage to Sonia proved
to be a disaster. He turned to hating women. She used to scream
at her husband and pull the T.V. plug out on him. He had to
wash all his own clothes and their love life was dismal. Less
than one year after his marriage he vented his hatred for
women on Mrs. Anna Rogulsky in Keithley, Mrs. Olive Smelt in Halifax, and Tracy Browne,
a schoolgirl in Keighley. All three victims were struck on
the head with a stone loaded sock. Sutcliffe masturbated over
the prostrate victims and then ran away. His attack on Miss
Claxton in Leeds nine months later had the same M.O. or modus
operandi.
The story about this strange attacker did not
escape the notice of the Ripper who lived in the area and
who had committed several murders in that area in the past
twelve months. He knew there was a disturbed maniac at large.
At the time of the Claxton assault only two of the Ripper
murders Wilma McCann and Emily Jackson
were linked and the legend of the Yorkshire Ripper was born.
At this point I would like to explain that the Yorkshire Ripper
and letter writer was the principal murderer in the series
of Ripper murders. Peter Sutcliffe's assaults and murders
became linked to the Yorkshire Ripper murders because of the
information contained in the Ripper's letters and because
of police error. Although the police knew that a copy-cat
killer was involved in the scene they didn't quite know what
the real motive was. The copy-cat killer finally turned out
to be Peter Sutcliffe, but for various reasons which will
be explained later, he was charged with all the Ripper's murders.
The Ripper knew that Sutcliffe's motive was sexual as he baited
him. Jean Jordan was a prostitute in Manchester and was similarly
struck down by Sutcliffe. Because there was no report of the
assault in the Manchester papers, the disturbed Sutcliffe
returned to the scene of the crime eight days later. He dragged
Jean's body from where it was hidden under a double hedge
and left it exposed on the grass. This disturbed man who had
earlier in that year engaged in tit-for-tat murders with the
Yorkshire Ripper had thrown in the towel. He wanted to be
arrested as the Ripper. Massive publicity accompanied the
Ripper's brutal murders. Little or none was attached to his.
Sutcliffe conducted his operations openly, with his car parked
on a busy motorway. He was hoping to be caught on the job
as the Yorkshire Ripper, but nobody saw him. Nobody wanted
to know. Six days later, he returned to the scene of the crime
a second time, where he deposited Jean Jordan's handbag, which
he had held in his possession. This time, he placed a brand
new five pound note in it, hoping it would bring the police
to his doorstep. It had the desired effect. Two weeks later
Manchester police were interviewing Sutcliffe. He didn't give
himself up and the police didn't make an arrest. One week
later they came to his house with a search warrant and again
questioned him and his wife. This time his wife gave him an
alibi. However, he was on a short list of suspects.
One month later, Marilyn Moore, a prostitute in Leeds was assaulted
because she refused to have sex with a client or as they are
called, a punter, until she got her fee of a fiver first.
She gave police a good description of her attacker which closely
resembled Sutcliffe. She also gave his name and a description
of his car. He called himself Dave.
The Manchester police never made the connection
because this assault was the responsibility of the Leeds police
under George Oldfield. Sutcliffe, in desperation picked up
prostitute Yvonne Pearson, who was soliciting on the same
comer that the Ripper had picked up Tina Atkinson in Bradford about eight months
earlier. He murdered Yvonne and hid her body under a settee
which he covered with sods of earth on waste land in Bradford,
where it was to remain for a further three months until it's
discovery. At the time of the pick up by Sutcliffe, Yvonne
was being watched by Ripper squad detectives, who were staking
out the prostitutes in Lumb Lane, in the hope of trapping
the Ripper. Yvonne felt safe soliciting on that comer. The
detectives were spotting all the punters, getting their descriptions
and their car numbers which they made notes of. They gave
a very accurate description of Sutcliffe, the man who picked
her up. They said he was a white Asian.
The only problem for Sutcliffe, who wanted to be arrested,
was that the policemen who had interviewed him only a few
weeks previously were from Manchester. These were Bradford
cops who were watching Yvonne Pearson. They didn't know that the white
Asian was on a short list of about a hundred suspects for
the Manchester murder of Jean Jordan.
Such police rivalry bedevilled the whole investigation
from start to finish and in many ways it was this territorial
independence and police rivalry, which was in large part,
an incentive for the Ripper to carry on his murders. Information
and clues were not pooled. Many policemen didn't even trust
other policemen and in fact there was some speculation for
some time that the Ripper might even have been a policeman.
In the meantime, the Ripper murdered Helen Rytka in Huddersfield. The customary brutality
of the Ripper guaranteed mass publicity for the Rytka murder.
At the same time, newspaper headlines referring to the five
pound note enquiry in Bradford were reporting, "100 names
left in Ripper hunt" and "Net closes on Ripper". Although
the police had stated that the Jordan murder was not a Ripper
murder, the mass media had different views. Peter Sutcliffe
was locked in a desperate battle with the Ripper.
Five weeks after the Rytka murder the Ripper
sent a letter to George Oldfield, who was appealing for information.
He gave Oldfield his count to date. He included in it, the
Jordan murder, and threw in the murder of Joan Harrison in
Preston, for good measure. Less than a week later he sent
a second letter to the Daily Mirror office in Manchester.
He knew the editor would send the letter straight to the police.
This time he was more emphatic when he said, "maybe Manchester
again", when he promised his next murder. Joan Harrison had
been murdered in Preston in November 1975. Her murder had
been accompanied by much the same ritual and violence as the
present series of Yorkshire Ripper recognised murders. The
only reason she was left out of the Ripper frame at this time
was that this murder was the responsibility of the Lancashire
Police, who liked to deal with their own murders and catch
their own criminals. The Ripper was exploiting human rivalry
by crossing boundaries. Two months later the Ripper delivered
his promise by murdering 41 year old Vera
Millward, a former prostitute, in Manchester again. A
fortnight later the first Manchester murder, that of Jean Jordan, was taken into the Ripper frame
by the police, on the advice of the Ripper himself. This action
effectively tied Peter Sutcliffe and his five pound note clue
into the Ripper frame. The problem was Sutcliffe's blood group and teeth marks
were different to the Ripper's. This was known from
the bite marks on the victims and from saliva which would
attend the bite marks, and from semen deposited when he sexually
assaulted some. The Ripper was the rare blood group B secretor
He was one man in sixteen. In rape and murder cases blood
testing is an easy, cheap and efficient way of eliminating
suspects for the police. Once the blood group of a rapist
or murderer is known, suspects can be easily blood tested,
and the innocent eliminated accordingly. With such a rare
blood group, suspects with B blood would be very few.

There was a break for almost a year. Then in
March 1979, the Ripper sent a third letter to George Oldfield
promising another murder and gave details of Mrs. Millward's
hospitalisation. The saliva used to seal the envelope yielded
traces of the rare B blood group. The writer also planted
clear bite marks on the paper. Less than two weeks later,
the Ripper murdered Josephine Whittaker in Halifax. Josephine
was a 19 year old respectable girl who was on her way home
late at night. As if to confirm his approval of Oldfield's
inclusion of Joan Harrison in the Ripper frame, he bit Josephine
deeply on the left breast just as he had done to Joan Harrison
and his letter paper. The blood group from saliva and teeth
impressions were identical. The usual wave of publicity attended
this murder, then in June 1979 the tape recording with the
flat Geordie voice was sent to George Oldfield. This promised
another murder in September or October. On the lst of September,
20 year old Barbara Leach, a university student, was murdered
in Bradford. In the meantime the deranged Peter Sutcliffe
had been interviewed by the police and was eliminated every
time because his blood group and teeth pattern didnt match
the Ripper's.

Sutcliffe then sought out a newspaper reporter
Yvonne Mysliwiec who worked for a newspaper
in Ilkley and on October 11th 1979 he confronted her and battered
her with a hammer and fled hoping she would identify him as
the Ripper. She didnt.
In the end Sutcliffe's desperation led him to
stage his arrest in an elaborate plan which he set up in an
outside police area, in Sheffield, South Yorkshire, because
the West Yorkshire police knew that he was not the Ripper.
Sutcliffe's crimes had been linked with the Ripper's
murders, and after every Ripper murder Sutcliffe felt a terrible
weight of guilt. He felt that he was being driven by the Devil
himself. In the first month of 1980, he received three interviews
from the police and he knew at that stage that they knew he
was involved, but yet he was not arrested. In August that
same year, Sutcliffe murdered Margo Walls in Pudsey. This murder was not regarded
as a Ripper murder. In September he assaulted Dr. Bandara, a Chinese student in Leeds. In
October he assaulted Maureen Lee in Leeds university. On November
5th he assaulted Teresa Sykes, a young housewife in Huddersfield.
None of these assaults were regarded as Ripper attacks. Then,
on November 17th, he murdered university student Jacqueline Hill. On the 19th of November The Daily
Mail reported, "the body of a 20 year old girl student was
found yesterday on waste ground in the heart of Yorkshire
Ripper territory. At first detectives feared that he had claimed
his 13th victim but a postmortem by pathologist Professor
David Gee revealed nothing to link the murder with the mass
killer. "This does not bear the hall marks
of the Ripper" explained the police spokesman."
Read the newspaper articles "Another Maniac at large" and Sutcliffe's workmates.
Since the 16th of November 1979 the police knew
the identity of the real Yorkshire Ripper and had a plan to
trap him. Oldfield returned to share the glory.
This police strategy may shock some readers
but I always sensed that this was their plan since they got
the breakthrough tip-off from me on 16th November 1979. Oldfield
and Co were confident of getting Tracey but wanted him with
blood on his hands to make themselves the most famous cops
in the world ever. What a capture it promised to be. An Irishman
commuting to kill in England. They could expect knighthoods
from the Queen and their memoirs would be hot property, classics
in criminal history.

The Ripper Chiefs posing in their trophy room in 1980
waiting for their biggest prize.
One more prostitute victim couldn’t stand in
their way. The deranged copycat killer could be forgotten
about and picked up later quietly. Nobody would be very interested
in him. David Yallop's research confirms this gut feeling
of mine.They were waiting to trap him.
From Sutcliffe's three interviews in early 1980
they also knew his involvement, that he was the disturbed
copycat killer. Naturally enough, Sutcliffe did not know that
the police knew the Ripper's identity but he wanted to be
arrested and give himself up as the Ripper. He told his boss
at Clarke's before he broke up for Christmas, with tears in
his eyes, that he might not be back, "I have things to do"
he said. He also told his best friend Trevor Birdsall that he was the Ripper. Birdsall
wrote a letter to the police identifying Sutcliffe. The police
ignored his letter and he subsequently went to them with his
girlfriend and he was again sidelined.
The police didn't want Sutcliffe because they knew the Ripper's
identity.
On the 2nd of January 1981, Peter Sutcliffe
in his square shaped car, which was the subject of intense
speculation since the Jacqueline Hill murder only six weeks
earlier, with false number plates and a black prostitute,
was parked suspiciously in the red light district of Sheffield.
Just before he picked up Olivia Reivers, Sutcliffe phoned
the police and reported himself as a suspicious customer.
Only weeks earlier, he had turned Leeds into a ghost town
with a tip off to the police, that the Ripper was going to
strike again. On that day Sutcliffe went to Leeds from his
own home town in Bradford. He had his wife in his car with
the false number plates and his assortment of hammers, knives,
screwdrivers and cord in his pockets. He wasn't arrested in
the massive police dragnet that surrounded the city. George
Oldfield wanted to get his hands on the Ripper very very badly.
Sutcliffe was unimportant.
I believe that Sutcliffe committed several other
serious assaults and the murder of Mrs Clay who's body was found near the Dewsbury
Ripper police headquarters. Detective Chief Superintendant
Peter Gilrain was in charge of this investigation in addition
to then being in overall charge of the Ripper investigation.
These assaults and murders were played down by the police
who had Tracey, the Real Yorkshire Ripper, the biggest prize
of all in their sights.
Sutcliffe had been hanging about Sheffield for
four days. When the Sheffield patrol car approached him, he
did everything possible to arouse their suspicions, including
giving them a false name and having false number plates that
didn't tally with the tax disc on his car. He told the police
patrol that he had stolen the number plates. He didn't want
the prostitute for sex. He asked permission to relieve himself
in the bushes and there he hid a hammer and a knife which
were later recovered by the police. When he got to Hammerton
Road police station in Sheffield, he planted another knife
in the toilet cistern when he asked to go to the toilet again.
This was found by policemen later on and created intense suspicion
about him. A man who stank to high heaven because of the clothes
he wore, a sweater pulled up where his underpants should be
and calling himself by a false name, Peter Williams, and who
had told the prostitute his name was Dave, and who was closely
resembling Marilyn Moore's Dave, whose photofit picture was
hanging on the wall of every police station, was guaranteed
to arouse suspicions. The Leeds police were called and they
told the Sheffield police that Peter Sutcliffe was not the
Ripper. However the Sheffield police were not satisfied and
wouldn't let him go so easily. They didn't know of George
Oldfield's tactics and they insisted on Ripper squad involvement.
When Sutcliffe was first brought into the Sheffield police
station, he quickly told them that he
had been a Ripper suspect. Later in Dewsbury he was
interviewed by detective Sergeant Desmond O'Boyle. It didn't
take much prompting for Sutcliffe to admit to the murder of
Jacqueline Hill but Oldfield knew that already. The
dilemma for the police was that they had said that
Jacqueline Hill was a Ripper victim when they knew she was
not. What a dilemma!! He also admitted
to the murder of Margo Walls in Pudsey in 1980, and to all
of his assaults. The police had to hold him. These admissions
led to Ronald Gregory's press conference on January 4th.

Ronald Gregory nudges George Oldfield at a press conferance
after Sutcliffe's
arrest as they embark on the biggest police cover up in
criminal history.
Gregory told the media that a man had been arrested
in Sheffield on Friday in connection with the theft of car
number plates. He said. "This man is now detained in West
Yorkshire and he is being questioned in connection to the
Yorkshire Ripper murders". Asked if the hunt was being scaled
down, Gregory replied, "You are right". Sutcliffe was headlined
as the Ripper before he was even charged with any murder.
The mass media had his face on every paper. The next day Sutcliffe
was hustled into Dewsbury Court with a blanket over his head
and he was charged with the murder of Jacqueline Hill and
stealing a pair of number plates. Then the bargaining began
and ultimately Sutcliffe admitted to most of the Ripper's
murders.


The rest is history, all based on a false premise,
and written about by newspapers over and over again, always
giving the police version of events and never questioning
the glaring inconsistencies.
THE MURDERS HAVE NOT STOPPED
|
 |
 |