 |
|
PREFACE
1978. Detective Chief Superintendent
Lapish, Bradford C.I.D.
'We must now face the very real possibility that there is a
second man preying on women".
1978. Daily Mail.
"Copy-Cat Ripper at Large".
1980. Sunday Times "Insight".
"Oldfield conceded to us - that there is not one Ripper, but
- at least - two".
1989. R.J.P. Warren. Deputy
Chairman of West Yorkshire Police Authority.
click on above to see the utube video of Mr Warren made in 2006.
"It was known in the top echelons of the police that two men
were involved in the series of murders".
1983. Ian Smith. Editor of Ch. Con. Ronald Gregory's
Memoirs.
"I agree with your premise that Sutcliffe was not responsible
for all the murders".
Brian Marriner. Author of "A century of Sex Killers".
"I don't think now that Sutcliffe did all the killings he confessed
to "
________
It was a well established fact that at the
time of Peter Sutcliffe's arrest, two killers were involved
in the series of murders and assaults; the Ripper, who had
been corresponding with the police, and a Copy-Cat killer.
Peter Sutcliffe was a disturbed man whose marriage
to Sonia Szurma triggered off a hatred
for females which saw him embark on a series of sex attacks
on respectable women less than one year into the marriage.
Sutcliffe's assaults followed by masturbation at the scene
coincided with a series of horrific murders of prostitutes
in Leeds and Bradford Red Light areas by a cunning maniac
who was dubbed the Yorkshire Ripper. Sutcliffe, who had a
certain insight into such attacks, came to believe he was
the Ripper. His first fatal attack was on Jean Jordan in Manchester,
and there he left a £5 note clue which led the police to him
for the first of twelve interviews over the next 3 years.
He was eliminated each time, because his teeth pattern and
blood group didn't match the Rippers. His murder of Jean Jordan
was then included in the Ripper frame, on the basis of information
confided to the police in 3 letters and a cassette tape, by
the Ripper himself. This locked Sutcliffe, the Copy-Cat killer,
into a battle of wits with the Ripper as their toll of victims
mounted, until Sutcliffe's arrest and "confessions", which
enabled the police to clear the slate.
He was duly convicted on his uncontested "confession" evidence,
and the police assisted victims of his assaults who remembered
him, into court, in order to convince the public, he was the
man. They made much of his four murders while they skimmed over
the real Ripper victims, relying on his "confessions" and ignoring
the forensic evidence. The goal posts were moved with
Sutcliffe firmly in goal.
The real Ripper, with the rare B blood group detected from semen
and saliva on bites, was written off as a hoaxer and officially
the case remains firmly closed.
The Lancashire police, who had responsibility
for one Ripper murder in Preston, wouldn't accept Sutcliffe's
"confessions" to their murder and he wasn't charged with this.
The man responsible for this Preston murder, and fourteen more
mainly in the North of England is still free in the U.K. and
is identified in this book as Billy
Tracey, as are the police responsible for
this gross criminal negligence.
Billy Tracey
police photofit of Ripper
From the time of Sutcliffe's conviction, all attempts to show
this evidence to the police were met with indifference and
indeed resentment. The official position of Sutcliffe's conviction
is resolutely adhered to despite overwhelming evidence. Anything
that could undermine the conviction is ignored or ridiculed
by the police but the following record stands.
The West Yorkshire Police
proved beyond all doubt that Sutcliffe
was not
the Yorkshire Ripper
|
|
|
.gif){kind=small}
