 |
 |
INTRODUCTION
On the 20th January 1976, 42 year old Leeds house wife
Emily
Jackson who had been soliciting for prostitution outside the
Gaiety public house in Chapletown, Leeds was lured by a prospective
client to a nearby alleyway where she was to receive a horrible
death and mutilation by a cunning sex-orientated psychopathic
killer. The almost theatrical display of her corpse, which had
been ritually mutilated, sickened hardened detectives who
immediately linked the murder to that of Leeds prostitute Wilma McCann,
who received a similar fate some eleven weeks earlier. The maniac
was dubbed, the Yorkshire Ripper. It was the start of what was
to become Britain's biggest manhunt, which escalated with three
murders in 1977, two in 1978, two in 1979 and finally one in 1980.
The Ripper murdered in West Yorkshire police territory, in
Lancashire police territory and in Greater Manchester police
territory. Up to 350 detectives were deployed full time on the case
for 5 years as the murders escalated. Two added ingredients
heightened the tension for the investigating police, who were under
increasing pressure with every murder to make an arrest. First, in
1978 it became apparent that there was a Copy-Cat
killer who tried to emulate the Ripper and about the same
time, the police, it was later revealed, were in receipt of
correspondence from none other than the Ripper himself. A well
described stocky bearded Irishman who was a regular
with prostitutes was the last person seen with Emily
Jackson. He became the number one suspect and his description
was published in England. He was not
traced.

Eleven months went by and the Ripper struck again in
Leeds. This time his victim was a poor Scots girl, Irene
Richardson, whose corpse received similar theatrical treatment.
Two months later, the Ripper lured Bradford prostitute Tina
Atkinson to her own flat, because all motoring clients were
suspect to her. There she became his 4th victim in the official
score. The stocky bearded Irishman was again seen
that night with Tina and this time the Bradford police put out their
call for him. He wasn't identified or traced.

Two months later, on the 26th June the Ripper was
back in his earlier killing grounds, Leeds. This time, because all
working prostitutes were taking meticulous precautions and working
in pairs, the Ripper chose a 16 year old shop-assistant as his next
victim. Jayne
McDonald's horrible murder shocked the nation and the Yorkshire
Ripper became national news. Fear and outrage forced the police
to adopt a unified strategy, and what had been a series of separate
murder investigations by the local constabularies became a co
ordinated manhunt led by the Assistant Chief Constable for Crime in
West Yorkshire, George Oldfield. This time the stocky
bearded man was again noticed in the street where Jayne met
her killer, and his description was again published
in England on newspapers and on TV He was not
traced.

Billy Tracey - The Real
Yorkshire Ripper

The Ripper was a regular topic of
conversation in Yorkshire and occupied many peoples minds. On the
9th October that same year, prostitute Jean
Jordan's body was discovered in a park near the side of a busy
motorway in Manchester. Her corpse had been dragged from a hedge
where it had lain for 8 days, and was again subjected to frenzied
mutilation with a pane of glass and her clothes were strewn all
around. It bore none of the Ripper's ritual hall-marks and was
treated as a separate puzzling murder investigation. A £5 note found
in her purse was traced to a number of firms in the Bingley Shipley
area of Bradford and several thousand employees there were potential
suspects. On 2nd of November 1977 one of these men, Peter Sutcliffe,
was visited by a Manchester detective in what was to be the first of
twelve police interviews. On 14th December, Sutcliffe assaulted a
Leeds prostitute Marilyn Moore
and ran from the scene. She described both him and his car
accurately. He called himself Dave. On the 31st January 1978,
prostitute Helen
Rytka who, to foil the Ripper, had an elaborate security system
devised with her sister, was murdered in a woodyard near where they
were soliciting in Huddersfield; George Oldfield's home town. Her
body bore all the Ripper's hall-marks. Oldfield appealed to the
public for information and was answered with two letters from the
Ripper himself, among others. The Ripper taunted Oldfield, included
Sutcliffe's Jordan murder, and a Preston murder in his count, and
promised another murder in Manchester. Two weeks
after receiving the second letter, the body of Bradford prostitute
Yvonne
Pearson was discovered where it had lain buried for three
months. It had none of the Ripper hall-marks. Sutcliffe, the
Copy-Cat, had returned to the body to expose it as he had done to Jean
Jordan in Manchester. The Bradford
police stated that it was done by a Copy-Cat
Ripper. A newspaper featuring an article about Helen
Rytka had been placed beside the body to associate it
with the Ripper.
On the 16th May, Vera
Millward, a former prostitute, was murdered in
Manchester and her body was ritually rearranged. It
bore all the Ripper's hall-marks. Two weeks later the police included
Jean Jordan in the Ripper frame on the strength of the Ripper's two
letters, which were then known only to the police. At least four of
the Ripper victims to date had been sexually assaulted and traces of
semen revealed he was of the rare 'B' blood group.
Peter Sutcliffe was eliminated in all his subsequent interviews
because he is 'O' blood group, and because his wife
convinced the police he was with her at crucial times of Ripper
murders. There was a gap of eleven months and then the police
received a third letter promising, to get back on the job. Two
weeks later, a 19 year old respectable girl, Josephine
Whittakerwas murdered in the same ritual fashion in Halifax,
by the Ripper. The third letter bore "B" blood saliva on the gummed
label and the imprint of the writer's teeth.
Josephine was bitten deeply on the left breast by the killer of Joan
Harrison in Preston in November 1975. The teeth imprints
were identical and saliva on both bites yielded the same
rare "B" blood group. The Ripper had taken credit for the Preston
murder in his first and second letter. He authenticated his
letters with the bite on Josephine
Whittaker's left breast. Then, in June 1979, the police
received a taped message from the Ripper who mimicked a
Geordie accent. He again included Jordan, Pearson, and
Harrison in his count because they had all been in the Ripper frame
for 6 months. The Ripper had effectively forced the police to
include the Copy-Cat's murders in his frame.It was a recipe
for disaster if the disturbed Copy-Cat killer were arrested. He
also promised another murder, 'in September or October'. Police,
scenting a major capture, released extracts of his hand-writing and
Geordie accent in June, in the expectation of someone identifying
them.
With chilling accuracy, on the lst September, the Ripper
murdered university student Barbara Leach,
within a few minutes walk of Bradford police Ripper
headquarters. The murders became national and
international news. The Ripper had become the most notorious killer ever.
.
Two books hit the market place to capitalise on the
publicity.

The urgency to identify the hand-writing and accent became
greater, and a massive free publicity campaign
followed. Meanwhile, in the Midlands of Ireland, the writer had
only succeeded in extricating himself from his association with a
former employee who was hired on the I st June 1978. This was a
stocky bearded Irishman who proved to be a notorious sex maniac and
who had been diagnosed in U.K. jails as an aggressive psychopath.
This man had a long criminal record in England. By chance that
November, I read a Sunday
Telegraph article, part of the police publicity campaign,
outlining a psychological profile of the Yorkshire Ripper. It came
as an unbelievable shock to me but I knew this man was the Ripper.
There was no mention of an Irish
suspect in the article. I travelled to England and gave the
senior police all the help I could. They never confided in me.
Suddenly the huge publicity campaign ground to a
halt. Suddenly the Ripper squad was scaled
down to a few men.

Then Peter Sutcliffe received the last 3 of his many interviews.
Shortly after my tip-off the Irishman was involved in a serious car
crash. He was laid up with a broken pelvis, while his wife,
who had been convicted of prostitution in
England, nursed him. Meanwhile, Peter
Sutcliffe, the Copy-Cat Ripper, had gone to pieces mentally. He
committed a murder in August 1980, which was discounted as a Ripper
murder. Then he attacked women in September, in October and in
November; and on the 17th November he assaulted Jacqueline
Hill. She was left for dead, and on a cold winter's night she
died of exposure due to her injuries.
It was the third Copy-Cat
murder. George Oldfield spoke to the Sunday Times Insight
team days after the Hill murder. "Oldfield conceded to us that no fewer than five of
the attacks, 3 killings, 2 assaults, fell into a "grey area" where
the balance of probability that they were the Ripper's work was "much
weaker." If he put his hands up to these killings then it would not
surprise us", Oldfield said. "But equally, if we were only able to
charge him with 10 murders and not the 13 we would not mind."
Oldfields sentiment, after almost 5 years on the Ripper trail, is
understandable. But it carries a sinister implication: if all the 17
attacks were not by the same person then there is not one Ripper
but at least two. Clearly though, most of the attacks were
committed by one person. The Ripper".
Read the newspaper article "Another
Maniac at large"
Six weeks later, the disturbed Peter Sutcliffe was arrested
by Sheffield police on routine duty. He was with a black prostitute,
and told her his name was Dave. Marilyn
Moore's description of Dave was in the Sheffield police station. The
West Yorkshire police, who knew he was the Copy-Cat killer, were placed in
a dilemma. Sutcliffe readily admitted he had murdered Jacqueline Hill
six weeks earlier; but she was in the Ripper frame due to their
tactics. An amazing press conference was called by Chief Constable
Gregory, who said he was "absolutely delighted", and that the Ripper
hunt would be scaled right down. The Press had Sutcliffe named as
the Ripper before he was even charged with the murder of Jacqueline
Hill. He was initially charged with this murder only and remanded. In the next few weeks a
deal was done with him, whereby, in exchange for his pleas of guilty
to manslaughter for 13 murders on the grounds of diminished
responsibility, he was promised no trial and a private room
in a luxury mental home, with a chance of parole in 10
years. While the police convinced the public that they had caught
the Ripper by holding the Copy-Cat killer, the real Ripper was forgotten
about. A.C.C. Jim. Hobson conceded Sutcliffe had been interviewed a
few times.
There was no public enquiry. In the furore
the police were later forced to admit Sutcliffe had been interviewed
9 times. The letter writer was written off as a cruel
hoaxer. Subsequent evidence showed Sutcliffe was
interviewed 12 times. There was an elaborate
cover-up of police blunders.
There was the inevitable rush to print a number of
books.


David Yallop
But I had to live with the fear and the burden of this knowledge,
and after many fruitless attempts to meet with the senior West
Yorkshire police, I decided to write the story down. I believe it is
important, and I believe in principles. It was a life or death
mission, and many sacrifices were made. When my allegations
were first published in England in May 1983, Chief Constable Gregory
resigned immediately, and George Oldfield and
A.C.C. Jim Hobson resigned shortly after. The
Ripper tried and failed to kill me, and is presently
believed to be in England, while a warrant remains
in Ireland since 1984 for his arrest in connection with an
unprovoked attack on three men with a Stanley knife. I wrote to
Sonia Sutcliffe, Peter's wife, in 1983, in 1984 and in 1985. 1
explained much of what is in this book. She never responded. I felt
a certain amount of sympathy for her then. I also wrote to Peter's
father, John, who did respond, and listened to my story. He gave me
valuable help in my research, and has actively helped me to expose
the truth, while not seeking leniency for his son. In May 1989 he
went on Irish National Radio to support my allegations. When I
read about Sonia's libel action against Private Eye magazine in May
1989, 1 decided to travel to London to meet her. I waited for her in
the hall of the court, and when she approached me I introduced
myself. She instantly recognised me and withdrew her hand. She said
in a loud voice, " I don't know you, and I don't want to know you."
As she walked off she said, " I'm not interested in one word you've
got to say." She avoided me by leaving through the judge's entrance.
The next day I disrupted the court and called her a liar. I
challenged her lawyers to sue me for slander and accused her of
seeking the jury's sympathy to get money, when she was well aware
that her husband is not the Ripper. I was arrested and later released
and Judge Michael Davies ordered that my remarks not be published by
the assembled media. The next day the jury awarded her record
damages of £600,000. Private Eye are a small company. They appealed
the award. While 1 am resigned to the fact that the West
Yorkshire police will never admit their mistakes, 1
believe the public should be warned for their safety. The murders
themselves were unbelievable and the police
coverup is incredible but
it is real. I believe it did
happen. It happened to all the victims, to the Sutcliffe
family, to the disgraced police, and to me. The Ripper is an
incredible man, but real nevertheless. Just look at what he
did. He knew some of the prostitutes he murdered.
He has murdered since, and will again.
Anna
Rogulsky (left) and Olive Smelt
(below) being escorted by police into Sutcliffe's trial. They were
assaulted by him in 1975. These assaults were brought into the
Ripper frame along with Sutcliffe's first murder of Jean
Jordan in Manchester. The police wrongly assumed that Sutcliffe
was disturbed in each case before he finished the job, whereas at
that time he did not intend to murder them.
THE MURDERS
HAVE NOT
STOPPED
|
 |
![]() |